Greetings, * Tom Lane (tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > Rob Sargent <robjsargent@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > Am I (again) alone in finding this a bit hokey? That a user name just > > happens to be a schema name ... > > That's actually strongly encouraged by the SQL spec, if memory serves. ... and all-but-required by some other database systems. Doesn't make it a good idea tho, imv. Thanks, Stephen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
