Rob Sargent <robjsargent@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Am I (again) alone in finding this a bit hokey? That a user name just > happens to be a schema name ... That's actually strongly encouraged by the SQL spec, if memory serves. regards, tom lane
Rob Sargent <robjsargent@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Am I (again) alone in finding this a bit hokey? That a user name just > happens to be a schema name ... That's actually strongly encouraged by the SQL spec, if memory serves. regards, tom lane