Thom Brown <thom@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > I guess I should read the docs more carefully. Shouldn't this be > insignificant for a numeric value? That would require the range code to know whether the subtype considers whitespace significant (or perhaps more usefully, whether an all-spaces input is valid). We've stayed away from requiring range_in to have any type-specific knowledge of that sort. Still, you could argue that the rule ought to be "an empty or all-blank value must be quoted to distinguish it from an omitted bound" rather than "an empty value must be quoted to distinguish it from an omitted bound". I'm not sure if we could get away with redefining that at this point, though. It looks like range_out quotes such values already, so maybe a change wouldn't be totally catastrophic (in the sense of breaking dump files). But I still suspect there would be more people unhappy than happy. regards, tom lane
