On 10/8/19 12:33 PM, Michael Lewis wrote:
Hi
Michael,
In
this case , I always need to include partition
key(date) in primary key ( if I have a primary key
defined on non partition key column e.g id (in my
case), to make it a composite primary key (id,
date). This would allow duplicate id with different
date,which is not desirable .
If you are generating the ID with a sequence, there isn't
any real world likelihood of conflict, but I do understand
your concern in terms of enforcing data integrity. Other
than creating a custom stored procedure that functions as a
primary key constraint, I don't know of any way around that.
Let's take a step back... why do you think you need to
partition at all? And why partition by the
date/timestamp/timestamptz field?
Because archiving old is (well, should be) easier that way.
--
Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.
|