-- Dirk Mika Software Developer mika:timing GmbH Strundepark - Kürtener Str. 11b 51465 Bergisch Gladbach Germany fon +49 2202 2401-1197 dirk.mika@xxxxxxxxxxxxx www.mikatiming.de AG Köln HRB 47509 * WEEE-Reg.-Nr. DE 90029884 Geschäftsführer: Harald Mika, Jörg Mika ## How2Use ## the ChampionChip by mika:timing ## https://youtu.be/qfOFXrpSKLQ Am 03.07.19, 01:39 schrieb "raf@xxxxxxx" <raf@xxxxxxx>: If the problem you are facing is similar in nature, you might be able to work around it by having a variable of the same type as the array elements, assign to it the record that you want to modify, make the modification in the single record variable and then assign that single record variable back into the array element that it came from. i.e. something like: declare a rectype[]; r rectype; i integer; begin ... r := a[i]; r.field := newvalue; a[i] := r; ... It actually works the way you suggested. Not nice, but as long as it works, it's ok ;-) I didn't even realise that you could have an array of records. I've only ever used arrays of scalar values. Yes, if that wasn't possible, I would have had to switch to a series of Array of scalar values. BR Dirk
