On 9/14/18 6:59 AM, Robert Eckhardt wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 9:41 AM, Adrian Klaver
<adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 9/14/18 1:31 AM, Chris Travers wrote:
I really have to object to this addition:
"This Code is meant to cover all interaction between community members,
whether or not it takes place within postgresql.org <http://postgresql.org>
infrastructure, so long as there is not another Code of Conduct that takes
precedence (such as a conference's Code of Conduct)."
I second that objection. It is not in PGDG's remit to cure the world, for
whatever form of cure you ascribe to. This is especially true as 'community
member' has no strict definition.
I understand the concern, however, if you look at how attacks happen
it is frequently through other sites. Specifically under/poorly
moderated sites. For specific examples, people who have issues with
people on Quora will frequently go after them on Facebook and Twitter.
these aren't a solution looking for a problem. If we just want to look
at the clusterfuck that is happening in the reddis community right now
we can see conversations spilling onto twitter and into ad hominem
vitriol.
Ask yourself, if this was a government agency tracking your speech
across platforms would you be as approving? Personally I find the whole
thing creepy.
My $0.02
-- Rob Eckhardt
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx
