On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 15:06:21 +0200 Thomas Poty <thomas.poty@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > In fact, PAF does not support slots. So it is not a good candidate if > > slot are a requirement. > Effectively slots are a requirement we prefer to keep OK, so either patch PAF yourself (not recommended) or choose something else. Note that two other ways are working with Pacemaker: * the pgsql resource agent (see FAQ of PAF) * a shared disk architecture (no pgsql replication) > > > a proxy HAproxy and > > > for fencincg, i am a bit disappointed, i don't know what to do/use > > Depend on your hardware or your virtualization technology. > Our production cluster (master and slave) runs on LXC container. Each LXC > container runs on a HPE Blade Server. The storage is on a SAN 3PAR array. > Any advice ? I suppose you could find fencing agents for: * the blade itself, but it would fence all the container running on it * the access to the SAN from the failing container I don't know if fencing agent exists for a container itself. Note that I'm not familiar with the container world, I lack a lot of knowledge on this technology. ++
