On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Karsten Hilbert <Karsten.Hilbert@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 08:23:07PM +0530, Sachin Kotwal wrote:
> You are right. Those naming conventions are old and that is why we have to
> improve those where ever and when ever required.
I'd love to see the "requirement" defined.
Regards,
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ eu.pool.sks-keyservers.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
All,
Please take note that when PG 9.2 was release, a column rename of
"procpid" to just "pid" in pg_stat_activity DID break prior user code,
therefore I must strongly advise against any other unnecessary column
renames in system catalogs.
--
Melvin Davidson
I reserve the right to fantasize. Whether or not you
wish to share my fantasy is entirely up to you.![]()
I reserve the right to fantasize. Whether or not you
wish to share my fantasy is entirely up to you.
