Sachin Kotwal <kotsachin@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > I can understand that it is important to maintain naming pattern same as > system catalogs, but in that case we may need to redefine system catalogs > naming conventions . Those naming conventions are twenty-five years old, and there is an astonishing amount of client code that would break if we ran around changing existing system catalog column names. It's very unlikely that any proposal to do that would even receive serious consideration. The bar to using new naming conventions in new catalogs would be lower, of course, but then you have to think about the confusion factor of having different naming styles in different places. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
