>Those naming conventions are twenty-five years old, and there is an >astonishing amount of client code that would break if we ran around >changing existing system catalog column names. It's very unlikely that >any proposal to do that would even receive serious consideration. >The bar to using new naming conventions in new catalogs would be >lower, of course, but then you have to think about the confusion >factor of having different naming styles in different places. Isn't there a word for the above : Technology debt :-) -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
