Michael et al, On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 6:57 PM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 11:56 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I haven't tried it, but it sure looks like it would, if you don't hit >> OOM first. pqAddTuple() isn't doing anything to guard against integer >> overflow. The lack of reports implies that no one has ever tried to >> retrieve even 1G rows, let alone more ... > > Yeah, looking at the code we would just need to check if ntups gets > negative (well, equal to INT_MIN) after being incremented. So there is no way to retrieve an arbitrary number of rows from the query? That sucks... Thank you. > -- > Michael -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
