On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 11:56 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I haven't tried it, but it sure looks like it would, if you don't hit > OOM first. pqAddTuple() isn't doing anything to guard against integer > overflow. The lack of reports implies that no one has ever tried to > retrieve even 1G rows, let alone more ... Yeah, looking at the code we would just need to check if ntups gets negative (well, equal to INT_MIN) after being incremented. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
