On Wednesday, June 15, 2016 4:21:47 PM EDT Alexander Farber wrote:
> Hello Jan,
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 4:17 PM, Jan de Visser <jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wednesday, June 15, 2016 3:56:07 PM EDT Alexander Farber wrote:
> > > Now I am trying to call the same function through JDBC driver
> >
> > 9.4.1208.jre7:
> > > private static final String SQL_SKIP_GAME =
> > >
> > > "SELECT words_skip_game(?, ?)";
> > >
> > > try (PreparedStatement st =
> > >
> > > mDatabase.prepareStatement(SQL_SKIP_GAME)) { st.setInt(1, mUid);
> > >
> > > st.setInt(2, gid);
> > > st.executeUpdate();
> > >
> > > }
> > >
> > > and sadly get the SQLException "A result was returned when none was
> > > expected.".
> >
> > Looking at the 9.4 documentation, I see something completely different:
> >
> > https://jdbc.postgresql.org/documentation/94/callproc.html
>
> your doc talks about calling stored functions which return SETOF or cursor.
Example 6.1 doesn't.
What I was trying to indicate that the page you referred to has undergone, um,
significant changes over the years.
>
> But my function is returning VOID, so according to
> https://jdbc.postgresql.org/documentation/94/update.html
> I was thinking I should call executeUpdate()?
>
> Regards
> Alex
Point is that you're doing a SELECT. A SELECT returns a result, which can be
empty. I would use executeQuery and ignore the result.
There is a bit of a mismatch between the JDBC stored procedure model and the
pgsql function model, because pgsql doesn't have true stored procedures.
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
