On 17/05/16 00:54, Scott Moynes wrote: > wal_keep_segments is set to 32. > > Here is the replication slot: > > slot_name | > n6lbb2vmohwuxoyk_00018732_f58b5354_79ad_4e6e_b18b_47acb1d7ce1f > plugin | test_decoding > slot_type | logical > datoid | 18732 > database | omitted > active | f > xmin | > catalog_xmin | 84884044 > restart_lsn | 1B3/4300CA60 > > Can an inactive replication slot cause WALs to be retained? Absolutely! That's what they're for. If you don't expect this slot to re-become active, you should drop it. -- Vik Fearing +33 6 46 75 15 36 http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
