Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Why does query planner choose slower BitmapAnd ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 22, 2016, at 02:49 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Seamus Abshere <seamus@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > Inspired, I changed cpu_index_tuple_cost to 0.1 (default: 0.005). It "fixed" my problem by preventing the BitmapAnd.
> > Is this dangerous?
> 
> Use a gentle tap, man, don't swing the hammer with quite so much abandon.
> I'd have tried doubling the setting to start with.  Raising it 20X might
> cause other queries to change behavior undesirably.

Doubling it was enough :)


-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux