Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Why does query planner choose slower BitmapAnd ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Seamus Abshere <seamus@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Inspired, I changed cpu_index_tuple_cost to 0.1 (default: 0.005). It
> "fixed" my problem by preventing the BitmapAnd.

> Is this dangerous?

Use a gentle tap, man, don't swing the hammer with quite so much abandon.
I'd have tried doubling the setting to start with.  Raising it 20X might
cause other queries to change behavior undesirably.

			regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux