On 12/02/16 15:45, Adrian Klaver wrote: > On 02/12/2016 07:37 AM, Sterpu Victor wrote: >> Hello >> Why is Postgres so slow on Windows compared to linux? >> Can I do something to match the performance? >> I have 2 servers: >> - one is Windows 8, CPU XEON, 8 CORES, 32G of RAM - my test query runs >> in 17 seconds >> - the other is Linux CPU XEON, 4 cores, 4 Gh of RAM - my test query runs >> in 2 seconds > Assuming the version of Postgres is the same on both machine. > In any case what are the versions on the machines? > >> I run the query on the same database. > What is the query and what is the output of EXPLAIN ANALYZE? > >> CPU is not used at max on the servers, RAM is fine. But that doesn't mean the servers aren't busy. To really compare, wait until your servers are actually quiescent - ideally no other users at all. Then assuming that Adrian's questions about configuration below don't yield any differences *and* your databases are actually identical on both machines you can really do a comparative test. Remember that your first run will load the data into cache on the respective machine so subsequent runs will be less dependent on disk sub-system speed. >> Is there a problem with Windows?My gues is that Windows is not using > I will pass on this. > >> the hardware resources as it should be. >> Can I do something to fix this? > Are the settings in the postgresql.conf files the same? > > > > >> Thank you. >> -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
