On 01/23/2016 03:31 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On 01/23/2016 03:08 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
On 01/23/2016 03:03 PM, Berend Tober wrote:
Adrian Klaver wrote:
Motion:
The Coc discussion be moved to its own list where those who care can
argue to their hearts content and leave the rest of us to deal with
technical questions. Upon a decision on said list the result be posted
to the Postgres web site for consideration.
Been suggested already, and rejected:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/56970135.6060203@xxxxxxxxxxxx
I'm an optimist.
With respect Adrian, that is a motion that never stands a chance. If you
don't want to read it, set up a filter that sends it right to the round
file.
Not sure why, there is precedence:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/47227E15.6030205@xxxxxxxxxxxx
JD
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
