Oleksii Kliukin wrote: > Thank you, now it’s clear. I have to say there is no guarantee that > the computation would be useless. Someone might be calling a function > that updates/deletes rows in the SELECT INTO block, being forced to > use SELECT INTO by inability of pl/pgSQL to just discard the result of > a normal SELECT. I know one can use a loop or call PERFORM, but in > some cases (a complex CTE computing the data for the function being > called at the end, which updates the tables with this data) actually > using SELECT INTO looks like the easiest path to achieve the desired > result. So this whole issue is just because it is not possible to use PERFORM alongside WITH? -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
