Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Sensitivity to drive failure?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: Sensitivity to drive failure?
From: Peter Geoghegan <peter.geoghegan86@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 18:54:07 -0700
Cc: PGSQL Mailing List <pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Israel Brewster <israel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <22383.1443803454@sss.pgh.pa.us>

I think it would be really handy if temp_tablespaces were made resilient against everything going away in the event of a hard crash.

--
Regards,
Peter Geoghegan

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- Sensitivity to drive failure?
  - From: Israel Brewster
- Re: Sensitivity to drive failure?
  - From: Tom Lane

Prev by Date: Re: "global" & shared sequences
Next by Date: Re: Shouldn't "WHEN (OLD.* IS DISTINCT FROM NEW.*)" clause be independent from data type?
Previous by thread: Re: Sensitivity to drive failure?
Next by thread: aggregates, distinct, order by, and case - why won't this work
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Postgresql Jobs] [Postgresql Admin] [Postgresql Performance] [Linux Clusters] [PHP Home] [PHP on Windows] [Kernel Newbies] [PHP Classes] [PHP Books] [PHP Databases] [Postgresql & PHP] [Yosemite]

Powered by Linux