On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 8:48 AM, CS DBA <cs_dba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > All; > > We have a 3 node replication setup: > > Master (node1) --> Cascading Replication Node (node2) --> Downstream > Standby node (node3) > > We will be deploying WAL archiving from the master for PITR backups and > we'll use the staged WAL files in the recovery.conf files in case the > standbys need to revert to log shipping. > > Question: whats the best way to ensure consistency of WAL archiving in the > case of changes (failover, etc)? can we setup the cascade node to archive > wals only if it's the master? is this a case where we should deploy repmgr? Look up WAL-E. It's works really well. We tried using OmniPITR and it's buggy and doesn't seem to get fixed very quickly (if at all). -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
