Bruce Momjian <bruce@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 09:58:36AM -0700, Joshua Drake wrote: >> On 08/31/2015 09:37 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: >>> Huh, why did we decide that when the community doesn't control any of >>> it? That doesn't make any sense. >> It was decided during initial development because the end result is >> that BDR will be included in core. >> >> At least as far as I recall. > Yeah, I just read the thread. I guess with the low volume makes sense > to use "general", but I figured if someone went to the work of > developing a website for BDR, they would just as soon create a mailing > list hosted there, but I guess not. The opinion back then was that it would be "low volume", but the number of bdr-related questions we see on general has really skyrocketed lately. I think it's time that topic got its own list. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
