On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 09:58:36AM -0700, Joshua Drake wrote: > On 08/31/2015 09:37 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > >On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 12:30:52PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > >>>BDR is not currently part of community Postgres so you will need to > >>>report it to them directly. > >> > >>As discussed a year ago or so, this list is what to use for BDR reports > >>and discussions, so this report is in the right place. > > > >Huh, why did we decide that when the community doesn't control any of > >it? That doesn't make any sense. > > > > It was decided during initial development because the end result is > that BDR will be included in core. > > At least as far as I recall. Yeah, I just read the thread. I guess with the low volume makes sense to use "general", but I figured if someone went to the work of developing a website for BDR, they would just as soon create a mailing list hosted there, but I guess not. It clearly is being developed by 2nd Quadrant: http://bdr-project.org/docs/next/index.html BDR is developed by the BDR team at 2ndQuadrant. Multiple customers contribute funding and other resources to make BDR development possible. 2ndQuadrant continues to fund the ongoing development of BDR to meet internal needs and those of customers. It doesn't look like a community project to me --- it looks like an open source project funded by 2nd Quadrant and its customers, which is fine, but I don't know why the community is fielding questions about it on its mailing list. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@xxxxxxxxxx> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. + -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
