El 13/08/15 a las 14:37, Wayne E. Seguin escribió: > The question is specifically about the replication feature mentioned here > http://www.pgpool.net/mediawiki/index.php/Main_Page for the purposes of > failing over minimizing downtime. They aim a completely different problems. The thing Joshua mentioned about BDR being *async* means that data will be *eventually* consistent. This tackles the problem with nodes which are distant (one node in London, another in NY, one in Tokio, ...) PgPools replication_mode is for nodes on a local network. It would never scale like BDR with geographically distant nodes. Conclusion, they don't solve the same problem, so it's hard to compare. Cheers, -- Martín Marqués http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
