On 06/02/15 04:27, Adrian Klaver wrote:
On 06/01/2015 07:11 PM, Arthur Silva wrote: In my opinion, FWIW, that really does not change anything. Whether you are dealing with 20 new features over a year or 10 over half a year the same constraints apply, writing the code and getting it reviewed over a given time period. Add in the extra overhead costs of more frequent releases and I see no gain.
I disagree. The fact that we have 1 release per year means there's one deadline, and if you miss it you have to wait another year for the feature to be available in official release. That's a lot of pressure and frustration for developers. With more frequent releases, this issue gets less serious. Of course, it's not a silver bullet (e.g. does not change review capacity).
Maybe this should be reposted to the hackers list?
Yes. And there already are threads dealing with this topic. -- Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
