Search Postgresql Archives

Why do we need an AccessExclusiveLock to validate a FK constraint marked as NOT VALID?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

currently, ALTER TABLE VALIDATE CONSTRAINT for foreign key constraints
acquires an AccessExclusiveLock on the referencing table.

Why?

If the constraint is in place but not validated (ADD CONSTRAINT ... NOT
VALID) it already prevents new modifications from violating the constraint.

The code that is called to validate the constraint, RI_Initial_Check,
contains this comment:

 * We expect that the caller has made provision to prevent any problems
 * caused by concurrent actions. This could be either by locking rel and
 * pkrel at ShareRowExclusiveLock or higher, or by otherwise ensuring
 * that triggers implementing the checks are already active.
 * Hence, we do not need to lock individual rows for the check.

Doesn't the presence of the NOT VALID constraint qualify as "otherwise
ensuring that triggers implementing the checks are already active"?

Is there any deeper reason? Or is it simply not implemented yet?

Thanks,
Torsten


-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux