Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Postgres as In-Memory Database?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Florian

Thanks for the remark. I've seen recently somebody from the "core" team (was it at PgCon Rev Meeting [1] or a blog) mentioning it meaning to revive it?

Yours, Stefan

[1] http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PgCon_2013_Developer_Meeting



2014-04-07 8:15 GMT+02:00 Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>:
On 04/02/2014 12:32 AM, Stefan Keller wrote:

It also mentions an insert-only technique: "This approach has been
adopted before in POSTGRES [21] in 1987 and was called "time-travel".
I would be interested what "time-travel" is and if this is still used by
Postgres.

Back in the old days, PostgreSQL never deleted any tuples.  Rows were deleted by writing the deletion time into a column.  As a result, you could go back to old data just by telling PostgreSQL to report rows which where visible at a given time.

Obviously, this approach precluded use of PostgreSQL in many scenarios.  For example, you wouldn't want to use it as your web application session store.

--
Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security Team


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux