Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Postgres as In-Memory Database?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Stefan Keller <sfkeller@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
2013/11/18 Andreas Brandl <ml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
What is your use-case?

It's geospatial data from OpenStreetMap stored in a schema optimized for PostGIS extension (produced by osm2pgsql).

BTW: Having said (to Martijn) that using Postgres is probably more efficient, than programming an in-memory database in a decent language: OpenStreetMap has a very, very large Node table which is heavily used by other tables (like ways) - and becomes rather slow in Postgres.


Do you know why it is slow?  I'd give high odds that it would be a specific implementation detail in the code that is suboptimal, or maybe a design decision of PostGIS, rather than some high level architectural decision of PostgreSQL.

Cheers,

Jeff

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux