Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Memory usage per postmaster process

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



=?UTF-8?B?R3J6ZWdvcnogVGHFhGN6eWs=?= <goliatus@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On 11/02/2013 08:47 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Author: Tom Lane<tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Branch: master Release: REL9_1_BR [3e5f9412d] 2010-10-06 19:31:05 -0400
>> 
>> Reduce the memory requirement for large ispell dictionaries.
> I checked this patch:
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/AANLkTi=4fUi1zoFMpZ==Yf14RJDv_G1xgAkVQMDyEtBk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

> I can't find it here:
> http://doxygen.postgresql.org/spell_8c_source.html

> I also don't see those changes in 9.3.1 source. Status in commitfest 
> list is " Committed". I can't see hold_memory anywhere.

If you read the rest of the discussion of the patch, you'd find out that
what got committed was not all that much like Pavel's original.  But
it has the same effect.

			regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux