Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Memory usage per postmaster process

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/02/2013 08:47 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Branch: master Release: REL9_1_BR [3e5f9412d] 2010-10-06 19:31:05 -0400

    Reduce the memory requirement for large ispell dictionaries.
I checked this patch:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/AANLkTi=4fUi1zoFMpZ==Yf14RJDv_G1xgAkVQMDyEtBk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I can't find it here:
http://doxygen.postgresql.org/spell_8c_source.html

I also don't see those changes in 9.3.1 source. Status in commitfest list is " Committed". I can't see hold_memory anywhere.

If you're not using ispell, it's not relevant, and I'm not sure whether
the savings were significant for anything but Czech.
I am using ispell.

Thanks

--
Regards,
  Grzegorz

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux