Search Postgresql Archives

Re: NOTIFY channel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Perry Smith <pedzsan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm curious what the design assumptions of the LISTEN / NOTIFY are.  For example, would it work to have a thousand LISTEN channels open at the same time or would that be abusing the assumptions that were made?  In short, I'm trying to understand if I need a few central LISTEN / NOTIFY channels that then distribute the events out or not.

Couple quick points about notify:
1) In somewhat recent postgres (9.0) notify implementation was
significantly optimized and expanded to include a payload.

2) notify does not work with pgbouncer (yet), although I have in the
past had a private pgbouncer with functioning notify.

3) notifies are not delivered until end of transaction, which is
sometimes useful, sometimes annoying

4) delivery of notifications is 'best effort', but that effort is
pretty much always successful.

5) listener's in the range of 1000's is ok.  but don't be afraid to
think about using payload and/or putting specific instructions into a
table that the client listener acts on after receiving notify.

merlin


-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux