On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 03:40:51PM +0100, Thom Brown wrote:
> On 25 April 2013 15:32, Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Karsten Hilbert <Karsten.Hilbert@xxxxxxx> writes:
> >> What I don't understand is: Why does the following return a
> >> substring ?
> >
> >> select substring ('junk $<allergy::test::99>$ junk' from '\$<[^<]+?::[^:]+?>\$');
> >
> > There's a perfectly valid match in which [^<]+? matches allergy::test
> > and [^:]+? matches 99.
>
> Yeah, I think there may be an assumption that a lazy quantifier will
> stop short and cause the remainder to fail to match permanently, but
> it will backtrack, forcing the lazy quantifier to expand until it can
> match the expression.
Yup, therein lies the rub :-)
Thanks,
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ gpg-keyserver.de
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
