|
Sorry – replying to my own
question…. It seems that the problem only
occurs when configuring the make with these settings : --with-libraries=/lib64
--with-blocksize=2 --with-wal-blocksize=2 Now, we *could* do a two
phase compile, one to perform regression tests and another for deployment.
Clearly we don’t want to do that. Regards, From: pgsql-general-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:pgsql-general-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Manning John Hi all… In my organisation we build PG from source on SLES11.2 using
GCC 4.3. Versions 9.1.x of Postgresql and earlier always passed all
of the regression tests but 9.2.3 and .4 fail on the following : Union Join Select views Polymorphism With This happens when using gmake check & gmake
MAX_CONNECTIONS=10 installcheck Mostly the fails are because the returned data order doesn’t
match the expected results. Another significant example is this output from the
‘union’ test : ***
/data/vdrive/Workspaces/jsm/apx/apx_system_fix_S4/ds_pgres/source/postgresql-9.2.4/src/test/regress/expected/union.out
Mon Apr 1 19:20:36 2013 ---
/data/vdrive/Workspaces/jsm/apx/apx_system_fix_S4/ds_pgres/source/postgresql-9.2.4/src/test/regress/results/union.out
Fri Apr 19 15:21:59 2013 *************** *** 490,504 **** UNION SELECT * FROM t2) t WHERE ab = 'ab'; !
QUERY PLAN ! --------------------------------------------------- ! HashAggregate ! -> Append !
-> Index Scan using t1_ab_idx on t1 !
Index Cond: ((a || b) = 'ab'::text) !
-> Index Only Scan using t2_pkey on t2 !
Index Cond: (ab = 'ab'::text) ! (6 rows) reset enable_seqscan; reset enable_indexscan; --- 490,506 ---- UNION SELECT * FROM t2) t WHERE ab = 'ab'; !
QUERY PLAN ! --------------------------------------------------------- ! Unique ! -> Sort ! Sort
Key: ((t1.a || t1.b)) !
-> Append !
-> Index Scan using t1_ab_idx on t1 !
Index Cond: ((a || b) = 'ab'::text) !
-> Index Only Scan using t2_pkey on t2 !
Index Cond: (ab = 'ab'::text) ! (8 rows) reset enable_seqscan; reset enable_indexscan; Sorry for the rambling question : is this problem common,
i.e. the expected results files need to be changed or… is it just me? J Regards, Fujitsu
Unless otherwise stated, this email has been sent from Fujitsu Services Limited, from Fujitsu (FTS) Limited, or from Fujitsu Telecommunications Europe Limited, together "Fujitsu". This email is only for the use of its intended recipient. Its contents are subject to a duty of confidence and may be privileged. Fujitsu does not guarantee that this email has not been intercepted and amended or that it is virus-free. Fujitsu Services Limited, registered in England No 96056, registered office 22 Baker Street, London W1U 3BW. Fujitsu (FTS) Limited, registered in England No 03808613, registered office 22 Baker Street, London W1U 3BW. PFU Imaging Solutions Europe Limited, registered in England No 1578652, registered office Hayes Park Central, Hayes End Road, Hayes, Middlesex, UB4 8FE. Fujitsu Telecommunications Europe Limited, registered in England No 2548187, registered office Solihull Parkway, Birmingham Business Park, Birmingham, B37 7YU. |
