Yes, this ML is not a right place to discuss this. Could you raise this issue at postgres-xc-general ML? Regards; ---------- Koichi Suzuki 2013/2/12 Pavan Deolasee <pavan.deolasee@xxxxxxxxx>: > This may not be the best place to ask these questions and you could > have considered using postgres-xc-general mailing list from the > Postgres-XC project site. Anyways, see my comments below. > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Zenaan Harkness <zen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Does somone know the object overlap likely between pg and pgxc repositories? > > There is quite a lot overlap. Even though Postgres-XC has changed many > files and added many other, there is still plenty of common code. > >> I ask because I could just git clone pgxc, or I could add a remote for >> pgxc to my pg git clone, and make sure the branches are added, and >> fetch that remote. >> And in this way, common files/ objects are properly shared in one >> repo, rather than duplicated. >> >> Thoughts? >> > > ISTM that's the right way, especially if you're interested in keeping > PG code as well. This way, you will avoid a lot of duplicates and can > also quickly do a "git diff" between files of these two projects. I > find that very convenient at times. > > Thanks, > Pavan > > -- > Pavan Deolasee > http://www.linkedin.com/in/pavandeolasee > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
