On 21/01/13 20:09, Tim Uckun wrote:
Just to close this up and give some guidance to future googlers...
Careful, future googlers.
Conclusion. Updates on postgres are slow
Nope.
(given the default
postgresql.conf). I presume this is due to MVCC or the WAL or
something and there are probably some things I can do to tweak the
conf file to make them go faster but out of the box running an update
on a table with lots of rows is going to cost you a lot.
Unlikely. Do you really think that a PostgreSQL installation typically
runs 100 times slower on updates than inserts and every other user has
just said "oh, that's ok then"? Or is it more likely that something
peculiar is broken on your setup.
Removing the indexes doesn't help that much.
Suggestion for the PG team. Deliver a more realistic postgres.conf by
default. The default one seems to be aimed at ten year old PCs with
very little RAM and disk space. At least deliver additional conf files
for small, medium, large, huge setups.
--
Richard Huxton
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
