Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Table with million rows - and PostgreSQL 9.1 is not using the index

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday, December 05, 2012 02:44:39 AM Edson Richter wrote:
> Sort  (cost=11938.72..11938.74 rows=91 width=93)
>    Sort Key: t0.nome
>    ->  Nested Loop  (cost=0.00..11938.42 rows=91 width=93)
>          ->  Nested Loop  (cost=0.00..11935.19 rows=91 width=85)
>                ->  Seq Scan on logradouro t2  (cost=0.00..11634.42
> rows=91 width=81)
>                      Filter: ((cep)::text ~~ '81630160%'::text)

According to that the logradouro table only has 91 rows, which is why it seq-
scanned it. Has it been analyzed? 

Also, partial text matches require a special index declaration, as I recall. 
Maybe post a \d of each table to help troubleshoot this.


-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux