I will make another test instance with pg 9.2 this time.
Concerning shared_buffers and wal_buffers, I found this article interesting:
http://rhaas.blogspot.ca/2012/03/tuning-sharedbuffers-and-walbuffers.html
Sébastien
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 5:28 PM, John R Pierce <pierce@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 09/13/12 2:08 PM, Sébastien Lorion wrote:I've never had to set maintenance_work_mem any higher than 1gb for plenty good enough performance.
I started db creation over, this time with 16GB maintenance_work_mem and fsync=off and it does not seem to have a great effect. After again 5 hours, during index creation, disk and cpu are barely used: 95% idle and 2-3 MB/s writes (150 reads/s, 90 writes/s).
whats the %busy on the disk ? if you have a slow disk device (such as a shared virtual disk), 90 write/sec may be all its good for. MB/s is fairly meaningless when dealing with random committed writes.
--
john r pierce N 37, W 122
santa cruz ca mid-left coast
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general