On 08/23/12 6:49 AM, Craig Ringer wrote:
In this case, what he's doing is seeking generalized performance
measurements. I don't think details were particularly necessary until
it got pulled off-track.
"42"
performance measurements without a very narrow definition of
'performance' are useless. depending on the nature of the application
workload, postgres can stress completely different aspects of the system
(cpu vs read IO performance vs write IO performance being the big three).
--
john r pierce N 37, W 122
santa cruz ca mid-left coast
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
