Search Postgresql Archives

Re: 9.2 and index only scans

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/28/2012 05:51 PM, Thomas Kellerer wrote:
Martijn van Oosterhout, 28.08.2012 10:02:
I'm not sure how oracle avoids the same issues:
- The index has no visibility information, so you can't tell if an
   index entry refers to a row you can actually see in your session.
   The visibility map might help here in the future.

In Oracle an index (entry) has the information about transactional
visibility.

Wow. Doesn't that mean that indexes are insanely expensive to update, since each index (and possibly also the table its self) needs updating?

I can see that making sense for index-oriented tables, but otherwise ... ugh.

--
Craig Ringer



--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux