Search Postgresql Archives

Re: 9.2 and index only scans

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Martijn van Oosterhout, 28.08.2012 10:02:
I'm not sure how oracle avoids the same issues:
- The index has no visibility information, so you can't tell if an
   index entry refers to a row you can actually see in your session.
   The visibility map might help here in the future.

In Oracle an index (entry) has the information about transactional visibility.

- Different versions of the same row (after an UPDATE for example) may
   both be in the index, Now if you're counting a primary key column you
   can work around that.

This also works fine in Oracle due to the visibility information inside the index.
I did a test where I deleted and inserted a bunch of rows in the test table (in a different transaction).
The execution plan - even the real one - still used the index.

But frankly, counting all the rows in a table is something I never do.

I agree, but I thought it was a nice example to test out this new PostgreSQL feature after seeing the SO question.

Regards
Thomas





--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux