Search Postgresql Archives

Re: timestamps, formatting, and internals

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/29/2012 04:28 PM, David Salisbury wrote:
> 
> 
> On 5/27/12 12:25 AM, Jasen Betts wrote:
>> The query: "show integer_datetimes;" should return 'on' which means
>> timestamps are microsecond precision if it returns 'off' your database
>> was built with floating point timstamps and equality tests will be
>> unreliable,
> 
> I find that rather interesting. I was told that I was losing microseconds
> when I extracted an epoch from the difference between two timestamps and 
> casted
> that value to an integer. So if I have integer timestamps ( your case 
> above )
> I get microseconds, but integer epochs is without microseconds?

test=> SELECT extract(epoch from(now() - (now() - interval '1.345577 sec')));
 date_part 
-----------
  1.345577


test=> SELECT extract(epoch from(now() - (now() - interval '1.345577 sec')))::int;
 date_part 
-----------
         1      

An integer is an integer so you will lose all the fractional parts:)
   
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -ds
> 


-- 
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxx

-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux