Simon Riggs <simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 7 May 2012 09:01, Vincent de Phily <vincent.dephily@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Would be nice to see it added to the documentation (unless I just didn't find >> it ?), as it is quite surprising, and might lead to problems if people expect >> to be able to read sequence values from the slave. > If you think so, please submit a patch. That's how it works here. Any documentation patch should be written by somebody who's actually researched the behavior a bit; in particular I believe this can be adjusted with the sequence CACHE setting. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general