On 7 May 2012 09:19, Magnus Hagander <magnus@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 7 May 2012 09:01, Vincent de Phily <vincent.dephily@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> Would be nice to see it added to the documentation (unless I just didn't find >>> it ?), as it is quite surprising, and might lead to problems if people expect >>> to be able to read sequence values from the slave. >> >> If you think so, please submit a patch. That's how it works here. > > FWIW, I think this would be a reasonable thing to document, given that > it violates the principle of least surprise for people who are not > intimately familiar with how replication and/or sequences work wrt wal > logging in postgresql. (but no, I'm not actually volunteering at this > point to write said patch due to my backlog already being too large > :P) Mine also. Its important that everybody understands that submitting a patch is the way to get change, plus its a good test of whether the change is actually worth the effort to make it happen. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
