On Tue, February 28, 2012 12:52, Adrian Klaver wrote:
> On 02/28/2012 09:50 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
>>
>>
>> Sigh. I will have to think on this before changing
>> anything.
>>
>> To my mind, the most straight-forward way of dealing
>> with
>> this is to remove the language from template1
>> altogether.
>> Thereafter, the db owner must explicitly add it back in
>> where required. So, the default would be no extension.
>
> Well that is how it was prior to 9.0.
>
It does not now appear to be the case. When I drop the
test database and attempt to recreate it the plpgsql
extension is automatically added back in with postgres as
the owner. This was a new installation of 9.1 and I have
made no modifications to the templates whatsoever.
template1=# \dx
List of installed extensions
Name | Version | Schema | Description
---------+---------+------------+------------------------------
plpgsql | 1.0 | pg_catalog | PL/pgSQL procedural
language
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E 3C3
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
