Hi, > it's a lot of work and right now the only people > who've done that work aren't giving it away for free - or not in any form > that can be integrated into PostgreSQL without removing other capabilities > other users need. One MPP vendor implemented columnar store in roughly six months -- lot's of work is involved there!. Anyway, all implementation what I came across took several shortcuts like no updates(append only) or no foreign keys, ... but it works! > That's not to say Pg can't improve. It can, and not just by adding column > store or index-structured table support. Improved parallelism capabilities > are needed in Pg I see most benefits coming from parallelism: 12hr query can finish in 2hr if sliced properly -- Ondrej Ivanic (ondrej.ivanic@xxxxxxxxx) -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
