Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Why PGSQL has no developments in the .NET area?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I do not understand what you mean by the term sluggish?

Every .NET driver has some overhead when you first load it, and then it is being cached into memory.

I have used Npgsql and it worked great for me.

If you are not satisfied with Npgsql, try Devarts connector.

On Oct 2, 2011 5:33 AM, "Rohit Coder" <passionate_programmer@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> PgSQL has just one old NPGSQL driver for .NET, which is itself sluggish. The ODBC driver works better as compared to NPGSQL, but I suspect the ODBC driver is not the right choice for ORM framework of .NET.
>
> I want to know whether there is any efficient .NET provider and is PGSQL compatible with the .NET entity framework.
>
> Regards,
> Rohit.
>

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux