The only difference JDBC has over psql is that it has to connect via tcpip. Not sure about pgadmin. Dave Cramer dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca http://www.credativ.ca On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 6:47 PM, Sam Nelson <samn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi list, > > A client is hitting an issue with JDBC: > org.postgresql.util.PSQLException: Connection refused. Check that the > hostname and port are correct and that the postmaster is accepting > TCP/IP connections. > > -pg_hba.conf is set to trust 0.0.0.0/0 (IPv4 only) > -listen_addresses is * > -I can find no evidence of iptables running on the server. > -PGAdmin connects just fine. > -psql connects just fine. > -I can find no errors in the log file from that day for the user that > the client is trying to log in as. > > We're working on getting access to more details about how they're > trying to connect, but in the mean time, does anyone know if JDBC has > any issues connecting that psql and PGAdmin wouldn't have? Is it > possible that JDBC is somehow susceptible to connection issues that > JDBC and psql are not? > --- > =========================== > Samuel Nelson > Consistent State > www.consistentstate.com > 303-955-0509 > =========================== > > -- > Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general > -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
