On Tuesday, June 14, 2011 3:31:12 pm Stefan Keller wrote:
> Hi Thom
>
> 2011/6/14 Thom Brown <thom@xxxxxxxxx>:
> > Shouldn't you be looking for mytable2_pkey?
>
> Yes; but that was my typo. I tried it several times on two tables.
> My explanation is that the message (saying that an index was
> implicitly created) is simply wrong.
Works here:
test(5432)aklaver=>SELECT version();
version
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PostgreSQL 9.0.3 on i686-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC gcc (Ubuntu
4.4.3-4ubuntu5) 4.4.3, 32-bit
(1 row)
test(5432)aklaver=> ALTER TABLE mytable2 ADD PRIMARY KEY(id);
NOTICE: ALTER TABLE / ADD PRIMARY KEY will create implicit index
"mytable2_pkey" for table "mytable2"
ALTER TABLE
test(5432)aklaver=>\d+ mytable2
Table "public.mytable2"
Column | Type | Modifiers | Storage | Description
--------+---------+-----------+----------+-------------
id | integer | not null | plain |
name | text | | extended |
Indexes:
"mytable2_pkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree (id)
Has OIDs: no
Note the btree designation.
>
> Yours, S.
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxx
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
