2011/5/30 Toby Corkindale <toby.corkindale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On 28/05/11 18:42, Carl von Clausewitz wrote: >> >> a few months ago, when I installed my first PostgreSQL, I have had the >> same problem. I've try to get any information about optimal memory >> config, and working, but there wasn't any "optimal memory setting >> calculator" on the internet, just some guide in the posgre documentation >> >> (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/interactive/kernel-resources.html#SYSVIPC). >> I got FreeBSD 8.2 AMD64, with 8 GB of memory (this server is just for >> PostgreSQL and a little PHP app with 2 user), and I have theese setting >> in postgresql.conf (which are not the default): >> > [snip] >> >> work_mem = 64MB# min 64kB >> maintenance_work_mem = 1024MB# min 1MB >> max_stack_depth = 64MB# min 100kB > > Just a warning - but be careful about setting work_mem to high values. > The actual memory used by a query can be many times the value, depending on > the complexity of your query. > > In a particular query I saw last week, we were regularly exceeding the > available memory on a server, because the query was requiring 80 times the > value of work_mem, and work_mem had been set to a high value. > > Reducing work_mem back to just 4MB reduced memory usage by a couple of > gigabytes, and had almost no effect on the execution time. (Actually, it was > marginally faster - probably because more memory was left for the operating > system's cache) Maybe, you're also aware that linux may decide to swap to protect its buffer cache (depend of the strategy it got in its configuration) and also that you may be limited by commitable memory. On a default install where the swap is NOT at least twice the RAM size, you're not able to commit all RAM you have. But, it protects the buffer cache for the not allocatable memory. So maybe you've hitten a step where you did swap your work_mem... anyway interesting to have a query where a large work_mem is not better... Will it be hard to isolate the case and make it public ? In the long term it might be a good test to add to a performance farm if it is not based on a non-optimum linux configuration (I mean if the issue *need* the work_mem to be reduced to be fixed). > > Toby > > -- > Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general > -- Cédric Villemain 2ndQuadrant http://2ndQuadrant.fr/ ; PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
