Search Postgresql Archives

Re: max_connections proposal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 29/05/2011 4:39 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
On 29/05/2011 10:44 AM, Edison So wrote:
Can anyone tell me that if the max_connections is above 100, the server
will use pooling instead?

No. PostgreSQL does not have any built-in connection pooling, that was
the point of the suggestion, to advise people that they might want to
consider it.

Whoops, bad wording.

"That was the point of my original suggestion: to advise people that they might want to consider configuring a third-party connection pool like PgPool-II or PgBouncer instead of greatly increasing max_connections ".

--
Craig Ringer

Tech-related writing at http://soapyfrogs.blogspot.com/

--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux